Custom Search

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Quick TNR/Scott Thomas Update

Yesterday we brought you TNR's latest intellectual dishonesty, you can read the whole thing if you want, but I want to bring your attention to one point they mentioned.

Indeed, we continue to investigate the anecdotes recounted in the Baghdad Diarist. Unfortunately, our efforts have been severely hampered by the U.S. Army. Although the Army says it has investigated Beauchamp's article and has found it to be false, it has refused our--and others'--requests to share any information or evidence from its investigation. What's more, the Army has rejected our requests to speak to Beauchamp himself, on the grounds that it wants "to protect his privacy."

Today, via Bill Roggio at the Weekly Standard we have the Military response to TNR's statement:

His commands investigation is complete. At this time, there is no formal what we call Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) actions being taken. However, there are other Administrative actions or what we call Non-Judicial Punishment that can be taken if the command deems appropriate. These are again administrative in nature and as such are not releasable to the public by law.

We are not stonewalling anyone. There are official statements that are out there are on the record from several of us and nothing has changed.

We are not preventing him from speaking to TNR or anyone. He has full access to the Morale Welfare and Recreation phones that all the other members of the unit are free to use. It is my understanding that he has been informed of the requests to speak to various members of the media, both traditional and non-traditional and has declined. That is his right.

We will not nor can we force a Soldier to talk to the media or his family or anyone really for that matter in these types of issues.

We fully understand the issues on this. What everyone must understand is that we will not breach the rights of the Soldier and this is where this is at this point.

Game. Set. Match.

Maybe TNR would do better to ask themselves why Beauchamp isn't calling them and why he has "declined" to speak to them?

For those that haven't heard or does not know the back story on this whole saga, all our posts on this subject can be found on one page here.

[Update] The Corner echoes my thoughts to a tee.

Tracked back by:
Can We Put the Beauchump Issue To Rest Yet? from Take Our Country Back...