Custom Search

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Intelligence Chief Says He Gave 'Least Untruthful' Answer To Congress On Spying When He Lied In March

By Susan Duclos

With the recent NSA scandal and the newly discovered Prism program which collected data on millions of Americans, from at least nine different tech firms including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple, as well as months of Verizon phone records on over a million of their customers, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is now attempting to weasel out of his direct lie to Congress in March when denied that the National Security Agency was "collecting" any kind of data on Americans.

His reasoning goes from it being an "unfair" question to the semantics and technical meaning of the word collection.

Then Clapper claims that his answer to Congress in March was the "least untruthful" manner he could respond with.

Below is the exchange in the March hearing of the relevant Senate Intelligence Committee. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.—who has long warned about excessive government surveillance of Americans, though in veiled terms because the information is classified—had just one question for Clapper. The especially important parts are in bold.
Wyden: "And this is for you, Director Clapper, again on the surveillance front. And I hope we can do this in just a yes or no answer, because I know Sen. Feinstein wants to move on.
"Last summer the NSA director was at a conference and he was asked a question about the NSA surveillance of Americans. He replied, and I quote here, '... the story that we have millions or hundreds of millions of dossiers on people is completely false.'
"The reason I'm asking the question is, having served on the committee now for a dozen years, I don't really know what a dossier is in this context. So what I wanted to see is if you could give me a yes or no answer to the question: Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?"
Clapper: "No, sir."
Wyden: "It does not."
Clapper: "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly."
Wyden: "All right. Thank you. I'll have additional questions to give you in writing on that point, but I thank you for the answer."
On Sunday, NBC News' Andrea Mitchell pressed him on the NSA collection and on the exchange with Wyden.

Clapper suggested that the senator's question was unfair.

"As I said, I have great respect for Sen. Wyden. I thought, though in retrospect, I was asked [a] 'When are you going to stop beating your wife' kind of question, which is ... not answerable necessarily by a simple yes or no," Clapper said.

"So I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful, manner by saying 'no,'" Clapper said, indicating that he did not consider it "collection" unless government officials actually reviewed the content of the communications. The NSA program, regarding phone records, scoops up "metadata"—phone numbers called, duration of calls, location and the like.

[Watch the March testimony to Congress below]

Full Wake up America NSA scandal coverage found here.