10/27 - The Grotesque Tangle Of Sedition - USAID Was A Nexus Of Racketeering And The Home-Base Of Deep State Foot Soldiers

October 27, 2026

The Grotesque Tangle Of Sedition - USAID Was A Nexus Of Racketeering And The Home-Base Of Deep State Foot Soldiers

Color Revolution Ninja, Danielle Reiff

By James Howard Kunstler - All News Pipeline

“We are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations — but please do not put that on the form.” —Eric Manton, of the DRG

They put it on the form, though, cuz somebody screwed up. Oopsie. . . .

Get this: the reason that a color revolution is underway at all in America is not really political anymore — if it ever even was. It’s because a whole lot of people have committed crimes against this country. And with each wave of attempted sedition, they have compounded their crimes with more seditious acts, arrant hoaxes, lawfare, election fraud, censorship, and wholesale looting of taxpayer dollars to keep themselves out of prison.

That’s what USAID was all about, and why it was taken down early in Trump 2.0. It was a nexus of racketeering and the home-base of the Deep State’s foot soldiers, bureaucrats who actually managed the money streams to NGOs that ran everything from election rigging operations to vast social services fraud in blue states, in concert with a Democratic Party that had nothing but rackets to keep it going.

That’s how the USAID’s defunct office of Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) has morphed into the new Democracy Renewal Group (DRG). This new DRG operates under another project called Branch-4 — as in a fourth branch of government, the permanent bureaucracy — and Branch-4 operates under an NGO called the Action Center on Race and the Economy Institute (ACRE Institute), a 501(c)(3) public charity based in Chicago (EIN 82-1199695). Note, the ACRE Institute’s primary funders include the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. You see how byzantine this is, echoing exactly the hyper-complex administrative workings of government bureaucracy itself?

And so, that’s why, for instance, one Eric Manton, a former USAID employee now working with DRG said, “. . . we are also starting to consult federal workers on how to do some blocking inside the govt agencies during emergency situations.” Blocking? What they mean by that is federal employees lodged in the official agencies should “help run out the clock. . . develop selective hearing. . . forgetfulness. . . or blame your workload” for whatever it takes to block enforcement of any executive action proposed by the Trump administration.

Those tactics are explicitly proposed by another org, the Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy (FWAD formerly known as Federal Workers Against DOGE), which is affiliated with DRG primarily as a partner in the Renew American Democracy (RAD) strategy and through the broader Branch-4 ecosystem. Confused yet? You should be. The flak-storm of acronyms is beloved by Lefty-leftists for exactly that purpose.

RAD is run by Danielle Reiff, a 20-year veteran of USAID color revolution programs in Europe and Africa. Her co-coordinator at RAD is one Paul Zeitz, an osteopath and rabbi who worked previously for USAID in Africa and for the State Department as Director of the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development, whatever that was. FWAD is led by one Beverly Schreiber

You might ask: why has the FBI not paid a visit to Beverley Schreiber to assess how she is organizing her members to “block” actions that the chief executive orders agencies to carry out? The Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy must have a membership list. If their mission is to block the work of their agencies, as explicitly directed by FWAD, shouldn’t they be fired from their jobs?

And let’s not leave out a few other sketchy orgs and their leaders: Erica Chenoweth, who operates the United Democracy Alliance (UAD) out of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, which likewise operates under the “umbrella” of the Horizon Project, led by Maria J. Stephan and Julia Roig. Stephan was lead foreign affairs officer in the U.S. State Department’s Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (whatever that means), roughly 2009–2014. She was also co-director the Future of Authoritarianism Initiative at the Atlantic Council, which is funded by George Soros’s Open Society org. Julia Roig was President and CEO of PartnersGlobal, funded by USAID, the State Dept., the Ford Foundation, and George Soros’s Open Society Foundation.

What you see is a concoction of intertwined subversive endeavors with more gears and escapements than a Schwarzwald cuckoo clock, all operating under the banner of “Our Democracy,” by which they really mean their prerogative to run your world (and punish you for objecting). This includes running a coup against the current chief executive of the USA. Much of this information has been uncovered by the tireless and diligent researcher Jennica Pounds, known as Data Republican on X. She remarked Monday morning: “What makes 2026 different is that it’s the first time we know of that we found an operational, short-term plan to actually do a coup.”

Coincidentally, weird, coup-ish events played out yesterday in the Brazilian election. A judge who had been President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s personal lawyer ordered the polls to stay open an additional two hours until enough votes were “found” to haul Lula across the victory line over his opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Chalk one up for the Globalists. Call it a DoorDash color revolution. Bolsonaro has refused to concede and is officially contesting the election. Expect street demonstrations by Bolsonaro supporters over this caper. Perhaps riots. Maybe Lula getting strung up Mussolini-style.

American coupsters will point to that as evidence that Trump supporters will riot after the US midterms. It’s all a giant mindfuck. Meanwhile, our coupsters have been outed. We know who they are and what they’re up to. And we are all waiting to see what federal law enforcement aims to do about it.

ANP is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. 
If you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.

All contributions are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

Contribute using Zelle, send to: 6233084121
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine


Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:

10510 South Ave
Poland, OH. 44514


Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clicking this ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads.  

Links to other sections of the ANP site:

 

10/26p - Loony Left Attempts To Use The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 Against Trump EOs On Voting - Here Is What It Is

October 26, 2026

Loony Left Attempts To Use The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 Against Trump EOs On Voting - Here Is What It Is

By S.E. Gunn, PhD - All News Pipeline

I have noticed the loony left is using the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 as a basis for challenging President Trump's EOs about voting. So, exactly what is this act?

On January 5, 1993, Al Swift (D-WA-2) introduced HR2 - National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (aka Motor Voter Act, aka NVRA) to establish national voter registration procedures for Federal elections, and for other purposes. This bill had 73 cosponsors (1 GOP 72 DEM). President Bill Clinton (D) signed this bill into law as PL 103-31 on May 20, 1993. The bill is summarized as follows:

National Voter Registration Act of 1993 - Requires each State to establish Federal election voter registration procedures by: (1) application made simultaneously with a driver's license application; (2) mail; and (3) application in person at a designated Federal, State, or nongovernmental office, or at the applicant's residential registration site in accordance with State law.

• Declares that this Act does not apply to any State that has no voter registration requirement [the only state that currently has no voter registration requirement is North Dakota] with respect to elections for Federal office and/or in which voters may register at the polling place at the time of a general election for Federal office.

(Sec. 5) Declares that each State motor vehicle license application (or renewal application) shall simultaneously serve as a voter registration application with respect to Federal elections, unless the applicant fails to sign the voter registration application. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) forms and procedures; and (2) transmittal deadlines.

(Sec. 6) Requires each State to use the mail voter registration application form prescribed by the Federal Election Commission (Commission). Authorizes a State to develop its own form provided it meets the requirements of this Act.

• Authorizes a State to require first-time voters to vote in person, with exceptions for overseas and handicapped or elderly persons.
• Authorizes the removal of a voter application in the case of an undelivered (returned) notice of an application made by mail.

(Sec. 7) Requires each State to designate voter registration agencies including: (1) all State offices that provide public assistance, unemployment compensation, or disability services; (2) State or local government offices; (3) Federal and nongovernmental offices (upon their agreement); and (4) armed forces recruitment offices.

(Sec. 8) Requires each State to: (1) assure that any eligible applicant who submits an application by a certain deadline is registered to vote in the election; (2) require the appropriate State election official to notify each applicant of the disposition of the application; (3) provide that the name of a voter may not be removed from the official list of eligible voters except by reason of death, criminal conviction, mental incapacity, change in residence, or voter request; (4) inform applicants of voter eligibility requirements and penalties provided by law for submission of a false voter registration application; (5) conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove from the official lists any voters ineligible by reason of death or change of address; and (6) ensure tht the identity of any voter registration agency where a particular voter registered is not publicly disclosed.

• Provides that any State program or activity to protect the integrity of the electoral process by assuring an accurate and current voter registration roll for elections for Federal office shall: (1) be uniform and nondiscriminatory; and (2) not result in the removal of the name of any person from the official list of registered voters for failing to vote.
• Prohibits a State from removing the name of a voter from the official list of eligible voters for Federal elections on the grounds that the registrant has moved, unless such registrant: (1) confirms in writing that he or she has changed residence to a place outside the jurisdiction of the registrar; or (2) has failed to respond to a notice from the registrar and has not appeared to vote and, if necessary, correct the address in an election during a certain period.
• Provides for the opportunity to vote of a person who has changed address without properly notifying the registrar.
• States that in the event of a change of address, for voting purposes, of a voter to another address within the same jurisdiction, the registrar shall correct the voting registration list accordingly. Prohibits such voter's name from being removed from the registry of eligible voters by reason of such change of address, except as provided in this Act.
• Requires the United States attorney to give the chief State election official written notice of an offender's felony conviction in Federal district court.
• Amends Federal postal rate law to require the Postal Service to make certain lower postal rates available to State or local election officials who certify that a mailing is in furtherance of this Act.
• Requires the States to maintain for public disclosure, for a minimum two-year period, all records pertaining to the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters.

(Sec. 9) Directs the Commission to: (1) develop a mail voter registration application form for Federal elections; (2) submit to the Congress not later than June 30 of each odd-numbered year a report assessing the impact of this Act on the administration of Federal elections during the preceding two-year period; and (3) provide information to the States with respect to their responsibilities.

(Sec. 10) Requires each State to designate a chief State election official to coordinate State functions under this Act.

(Sec. 11) Provides a private right of action for an individual aggrieved by a violation of this Act.

(Sec. 12) Imposes criminal penalties upon any person who: (1) intimidates, threatens, or coerces any person for registering or voting or exercising any right under this Act; or (2) deprives or defrauds the inhabitants of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process.

(Sec. 13) Sets forth the effective date of this Act (January 1, 1995).

Being able to register to vote is not dependent on obtaining a Driver's License. It just allows you to register to vote when you apply for a Driver's License. 

Many states (of which mine is one) are working to pass state laws that automatically register you to vote when you obtain a Driver's License without checking your eligibility or even asking if you want to register to vote (some do not). And some of these states do not check citizenship when issuing Driver's Licenses but register you to vote anyway.

Final House Vote 154 result 259 (20 GOP 238 DEM 1 IND) to 164 (150 GOP 14 DEM) with 9 members not voting (6 GOP 3 DEM).

Composition of the House in 1993 was 170 GOP 252 DEM 1 IND.

Final Senate Vote 118 result 62 (6 GOP 56 DEM) to 36 (36 GOP) with 2 members not voting (Hatch (R-UT) and Rockefeller (D-WV))

Composition of the Senate in 1993 was 43 GOP and 57 DEM

This bill was passed when the DEMs had control of BOTH the House and the Senate and they only required a simple majority of the Senate to pass the bill (but now the SAVE Act cannot be passed with a simple majority of the Senate?).

 
 Due to the globalists war on truth, ANP must depend on reader donations (link) to keep the website active. Anything ANP readers can do to help is greatly appreciated (link).

There has been one attempt to amend (HR4318) and one attempt to repeal (HR55) the NVRA.

On June 23, 2023, HR4318 - To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to eliminate reliance on the change of address information provided by the United States Postal Service for the purpose of removing ineligible voters from the official list of voters in a State, and for other purposes was introduced by Gary J Palmer (R-AL-6). The bill had no cosponsors. This bill is summarized as follows:

This bill revises requirements related to voter removal programs.

Currently, each state must conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters by reason of (1) the death of the voter, or (2) a change in the residence of the voter. A state may meet this requirement by establishing a program under which change-of-address information is provided by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). This bill removes the ability of states to rely on this change-of-address information provided by the USPS for the purpose of removing the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.

This bill never made it out of House Committee on House Administration (referred June 23, 2023). Because it was not completed by the end of the Congressional session (2023-2024), the bill is now moot.

On January 3, 2025, HR55 - To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 was introduced by Andy Biggs (R-AZ-5). This bill had 1 Cosponsor (Scott Perry (R-PA-10). This bill is summarized as follows:

This bill repeals the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. The act established certain voter registration requirements for federal elections, such as the requirement for states to allow individuals to register to vote when they apply for a driver's license.

This bill was referred to the House Committee on House Administration on January 3, 2025. It has until the end of this Congressional session to make it to a vote or it, too, becomes moot. 

Contact the members of this committee asking them to send HR55 to a vote before it becomes moot: 

Chairman Bryan Steil (R-WI-01); Ranking Member Joseph D Morelle (D-NY-25); Vice Chair Laurel M Lee (R-FL-15); Republican Members Barry Loudermilk (GA-11), H Morgan Griffith (VA-09), Gregory F Murphy (NC-03), Stephanie I Bice (OK-25), Mike Carey (OH-15), and Mary E Miller (IL-15); Democratic Members Terri A Sewell (AL-07), Norma J Torres (CA-35), and Julie Johnson (TX-32).

Also consider contacting Mike Johnson (R-LA-4), Speaker of the House asking about getting HR55 out of committee and to the floor for a vote.

Right now, the GOP has a simple majority of both the House and the Senate. After the election on November 3, 2026, that will change. Either the GOP will remain in control with the same or more seats or they lose control to the DEMs come noon on January 3, 2027. 

I know some people only vote when they can vote for who will be the next president and skip the midterm elections. Please consider voting this midterm. 

Your choice is simple:

the republican party (unfortunately with the RINOs) 

OR

communists posing as socialists posing as Democratic Socialists of America posing as members of the democratic party. While I realize there are RINOs in the GOP, electing them is still better than electing communists. Be careful with Independent candidates as well because most of them vote with the Democrats in Congress. (For more information on the Communist Control Act please review my August 24, 2026 ANP article.)

 AND

Watch out for the new Islamic coalition (they could be running as GOPs OR DEMs) as well since they want to install Shari'a law here (for more info on Islam and their laws please review my December 23, 2025 and December 26, 2025 ANP articles). They mean for their Shari'a law to completely replace our Constitutional Republic's Constitution and Bill of Rights (for more information on our Constitutional Republic please review my August 19, 2026 and August 20, 2026 ANP Articles).

There are only a couple months before this Congressional session ends. If the GOP remains in control of both chambers of Congress, perhaps they will finally pass the laws We The People want passed!

For more articles by SE Gunn, click here.

ANP Fundraiser:

‘Dangerous, Derogatory, Harmful, Unreliable!’

Those are some of the exact words used by Google’s censors, aka 'Orwellian content police,' in describing many of our controversial stories. Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP. 

 

 So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.

 

All contributions are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

 

Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

Contribute using Zelle, send to: 6233084121

 

One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:

Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine

 

Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:

10510 South Ave

Poland, OH. 44514

Links to other sections of the ANP site:

10/26a - ‘Oh, Stop It!’: Todd Blanche Cuts Off CNN Dana Bash Speculating How Alaska Election Lawsuit Could Lead To Another Jan 6

October 26, 2026

‘Oh, Stop It!’: Todd Blanche Cuts Off CNN Dana Bash Speculating How Alaska Election Lawsuit Could Lead To Another Jan 6

By Jack McGeever (DCNF) - All News Pipeline

Attorney General Todd Blanche snapped Sunday at CNN anchor Dana Bash after she suggested the Trump administration’s election lawsuit in Alaska could lay the groundwork for another confrontation resembling the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

The heated exchange unfolded during a “State of the Union” interview as Bash pressed Blanche over the Justice Department’s decision to sue Alaska ahead of the Nov. 3, 2026, midterm elections. The lawsuit centers on concerns that two Senate candidates sharing nearly identical names could confuse voters, potentially affecting the outcome of a closely watched race which could tip the balance of power in the upper legislative chamber.

“[L]et’s just talk turkey,” Bash said, before raising the possibility of a scenario in which President Donald Trump attempts to overturn an election result he disputes, “because one of the big questions is whether or not the president is laying the groundwork for a scenario where — whether it’s Alaska or somewhere else — there is, in your words a couple of days ago, a ‘doomsday scenario,’ and we could be in a situation where President Trump tries to overturn the election, and the result of that could be, God forbid, what we saw after Jan. 6. That is one of the fundamental questions—”

“I mean— Oh, stop it!” Blanche cut in. “Oh, you got to stop it with that. You are not being a real person. Come on, man.”

“No,” Bash responded during their crosstalk. “Why are you yelling at me?”

Blanche argued that the administration was responding to allegations of voter confusion in Alaska, rather than preparing to challenge election results nationwide.

“That is crazy,” Blanche continued.

“It is not crazy,” Bash replied, adding after Blanche started to answer, “I would have said that ‘before Jan. 6.’”

“You asked a question. Let me answer it,” the attorney general responded. “Hold on. You set me up. You set me up with the following question: because the president, because the Department of Justice is concerned that there is an absolute fraud happening in Alaska and he wants to do something about it, you’re saying, ‘Mr. Attorney General, because the president of the United States wants to stop a fraud and confusion is he going to do something crazy?’ That is not a real question.”

“This is a president that has a history,” Bash pushed back during the crosstalk. “I wish it wasn’t [‘a real question.’].”

“Well, if you’re in luck then, because it’s not. It’s not,” Blanche replied. “We’re not laying any ‘groundwork’ for the president to do that, so your premise, your question, is not true!”

“What I said — and so you have to listen to what I say, or it’s not a fair conversation — what I said is, the groundwork that we are laying is for Alaska,” he added. “[T]he state of Alaska, if it becomes an issue after the election, will have the ability to determine whether there was confusion that violates the law in determining who the senator should be. That is not Donald J. Trump. That is not our president.”

Due to the globalists war on truth, ANP must depend on reader donations to keep the website active. 

Anything ANP readers can do to help is greatly appreciated. 

.@AGToddBlanche: "In our system, we should not have a candidate who has to worry about another candidate being on the ballot for no other reason than to confuse voters. So it‘s something the Department of Justice has been looking at for a while." https://t.co/mWVDqywuci

— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) October 25, 2026

“And so we are not doing anything improper,” Blanche later concluded. “We’re not doing anything we’re not allowed to do. And we have to let the process play out. But I do think it’s important for the American people to understand that we are not, President Trump is not trying to take over a state election in any way, shape, or form. What we’re trying to do is make it clear that if it is obvious after the election that confusion led to an improper and illegal result, that the Alaskan system should be able to address that.”

The Justice Department filed its lawsuit Thursday over the presence of a “Daniel J. Sullivan” on the Alaska ballot alongside incumbent Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan in facing former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola. Peltola sustained “minor injuries” while traveling to an event in her vehicle Saturday.

The DOJ’s complaint argues that the similarities between the two candidates’ names could mislead voters intending to support the incumbent senator. It asks a federal court to prevent Alaska from certifying a potentially affected election result pending an investigation into whether votes intended for the incumbent were mistakenly cast for the other Sullivan.

Trump acknowledged Friday he had directed the Justice Department to pursue the litigation, according to ABC News.

Bash questioned whether that admission indicated the lawsuit was politically motivated, and asked Blanche whether he viewed his position as helping Republicans retain the Senate seat.

Blanche rejected that characterization, arguing that the president has a responsibility to address potential irregularities in federal elections.

The attorney general also clarified the department’s position Saturday, rejecting suggestions that the administration intended to interfere with voting or prevent Alaska from certifying its election.

The Department of Justice does not seek to stop any ballot from being cast or to stop the certification of Alaska's election. This litigation seeks to ensure that after Alaskans cast their ballots, they are preserved in a manner so that only Alaska's governing officials have the information necessary to make a determination as to whether Alaskan voters were confused or mislead. The lawsuit was written by Justice Department attorneys and the Department did not coordinate with any campaign or candidate, but rather relied solely on federal law.

— Attorney General Todd Blanche (@AGToddBlanche) October 24, 2026

“The Department of Justice does not seek to stop any ballot from being cast or to stop the certification of Alaska’s election,” Blanche wrote on X. He also maintained that the litigation was intended to preserve election materials and allow Alaska officials to determine whether voters had been misled, adding that Justice Department attorneys prepared the lawsuit without coordinating with any candidate or campaign. 

RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Alaska’s Political Battleground Catches Eye Of Dark Money-Tied Environmental Groups

The complaint nevertheless explicitly requests a federal judge block certification under certain circumstances, a provision which has drawn criticism from election-law advocates.

The American Civil Liberties Union notably challenged the lawsuit, arguing that the federal government lacks legal authority to intervene in Alaska’s election certification process under the National Voter Registration Act.

ANP is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. 
If you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.

All contributions are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

Contribute using Zelle, send to: 6233084121
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine


Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:

10510 South Ave
Poland, OH. 44514


Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clicking this ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads.  

Links to other sections of the ANP site:

 

10/25 - The War For Western Civilization Is Here - Only Citizen-Patriots Can Save The West

October 25, 2026

The War For Western Civilization Is Here - Only Citizen-Patriots Can Save The West

Image via Pexels

By J.B. Shurk (American Thinker) - All News Pipeline

In a previous essay, I wrote why “Many Western Governments Won’t Survive.”  Now I will address why many Western nations will prevail, despite the destructive policies of their governments.  Who will save the West?  Citizen-patriots.

Most Western governments have already proved themselves incapable of defending the West.  They cannot or will not defend their sovereign borders from foreign invaders.  They will not defend Christian principles and prefer to mock (and even prosecute) followers of Christ.  They will not defend their cultures, historic symbols, traditions, or beliefs.  They will not defend private property or the fruits of a person’s labor and instead use taxes and regulations to steal more and more from citizens.  They will not defend free speech or the right to self-defense.  They will not defend the West’s rich intellectual inheritance accumulated over millennia and stretching from Jerusalem and Athens to Northern Europe and the Americas.  They will not defend the West’s way of life.

Western governments have failed to protect the West, or worse, they have intentionally sabotaged the West through many decades of institutional duplicity, psychological warfare, moral decay, venality, public contempt, foreign allegiance, and self-hatred.  As Western governments have led the charge to destroy Western nations, they can hardly be expected to save us from the very carnage that they have unleashed.

Instead, the coming Western renaissance will arise with the people.  

We have seen flickers of this incendiary social revolution since the turn of the century.  

After the 9/11 Islamic terror attacks on the United States, a patriotic fervor united Americans who promised each other, “Never again.”  Many of us thought the West was finally prepared to defend its civilization from the scourge of Islamism.  

Rather than securing Western civilization from its enemies, the U.S. government gave us an expansive domestic surveillance system that eliminated Americans’ privacy, twenty years of war filled with ephemeral successes, misguided “democracy-building” missions in parts of the world hostile to our presence, and an influx of Muslim immigrants into our hometowns.  

President Bush and Congress spied on us with the USA PATRIOT Act while calling Islam a “religion of peace.”  President Obama mocked American exceptionalism during a global apology tour and preposterously insisted that Muslims were instrumental to America’s founding.  

Eventually, the same members of Congress who overwhelmingly voted for war in Asia and the Middle East repudiated American patriots who risked (or lost) their lives fighting Islamic warriors “over there” so that we wouldn’t have to fight them “over here.”  In another instance of bitter irony, American veterans of those wars are often called “Islamophobes” and monitored in the U.S. as “potential domestic terrorists.” 

New York City has a Muslim mayor from Uganda.  Minnesota has a Muslim congresswoman from Somalia who might not even be a naturalized American citizen.  Michigan has another Muslim congresswoman who hates America and loves Hamas.  And Michigan might elect as senator a man with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.  Both the number of mosques and the number of Muslims in the United States have doubled since 9/11.  

After the worst attack on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor, American patriots volunteered to defend Western civilization from Islamic conquest.  Infuriatingly, the U.S. government imported Islamic civilization into America while patriots were too busy fighting elsewhere to defend the Bill of Rights and their countrymen at home.  The sting of that betrayal will never dissipate.

Patriots in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Australia, and across continental Europe have felt that same sting of betrayal.  No Western government ever asked its citizens for permission to cease enforcing national borders so that it could flood ancient homelands with foreigners.  

The 2016 Brexit referendum in the U.K. was an after-the-fact vote on, among other things, Britain’s European Union-mandated open borders policies.  After British patriots voted for the government to get out of the E.U. and secure the kingdom from further invasion, the British Establishment effectively ignored the outcome and flooded the U.K. with even more foreign nationals.  

Aside from a few Central European countries whose people and leaders have doggedly resisted the E.U.’s attempts to replace native citizens with foreigners, Europe’s demographic composition has substantially changed this century.  From 2015 to 2024, over six million foreigners settled in Germany, increasing its foreign-born population from 13% to 21%.  During that time, the U.K. added over four million foreigners.  Malta’s foreign-born population jumped from 9% to 32%.  A new documentary called Replacing Europe traces how European governments and Western NGOs use taxpayer funds to destroy once sovereign nation states with mass migration.  As one critic of the E.U. Establishment puts it, “Bureaucracies in Brussels regulate everything except the influx that is changing Europe’s demographics permanently.”

The end result was entirely predictable: 87% of criminal suspects in Germany are foreigners; 74% of sex crime suspects in Spain’s Basque region are foreigners; foreigners are responsible for 87% of thefts, 61% of sexual violence, and 60% of robberies on Paris public transport; 47% of violent criminals in Bavaria are foreigners; over 80% of North African asylum seekers in Switzerland are criminal suspects; and after covering up the atrocities of Muslim rape gangs who raped over a quarter of a million British girls over the last two decades, British authorities now hand out a booklet to invaders informing them that raping women and children is illegal in the U.K. and may negatively affect their fake asylum claims.

An evil has fallen upon all of Europe, and Western governments that have opened their nations to an invasion from violent foreigners are to blame.  Western governments that aided and abetted illegal immigration into their countries are criminally liable and morally culpable for every rape, robbery, murder, and terrorist attack that foreigners carry out in Western lands.  Western citizens who refuse to let their families and friends be raped or murdered are not “racists,” “bigots,” “Nazis,” or “white supremacists.”  On the contrary, Western governments are guilty of crimes against humanity for actively assisting foreigners who intend to rape and murder Western citizens.

After enduring their governments’ crimes against humanity for the entirety of this century, Western citizens are becoming increasingly more vocal that these mass migration attacks on Western populations must finally end.  Some refer to this growing social revolution as a “Great Awakening.”  Western governments denounce it as “populism,” as if “democracy” were worth praising only when an elite bureaucratic oligarchy forces its decisions upon everyone else.  

In France, those who wish to defend their nation look to the National Rally.  In Germany, patriots vote for members of the Alternative for Deutschland.  In the United Kingdom, Brits are joining Reform UK and Restore Britain.  In the United States, MAGA voters have taken over and remade the Republican Party.  Similar parties exist in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Australia, and every other Western nation whose people wish to survive the next few decades.

The foreign invasion of Spain’s Ceuta jolted more Westerners awake.  The blazing fires that foreigners have started across France have shone like emergency flares across the West.  In Britain (where one new invader is granted settlement or citizenship every minute), MP Rupert Lowe’s devastating “Rape Gang Inquiry Report” has shocked the conscience of every Westerner not complicit in the Muslim-perpetrated, State-sanctioned mass rape of several hundred thousand girls.

There is a growing understanding across the West: Governments cannot protect us when they are the very entities putting us in danger.  Only citizen-patriots can save the West.  

As more Westerners reach this conclusion, the stigma of being called a “racist,” “bigot,” “Christian nationalist,” or “white supremacist” disappears.  People who fight for a righteous cause do not care if an evil government calls them names.  We must announce this “Great Awakening” loudly and clearly: Patriots, rise.  The war for Western civilization is here.

ANP is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. 
If you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.

All contributions are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

Contribute using Zelle, send to: 6233084121
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine


Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:

10510 South Ave
Poland, OH. 44514


Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clicking this ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads.  

Links to other sections of the ANP site: