By Susan Duclos
Last night in a piece at Beforeitsnews, (Also posted at WuA) I pointed out that videos of the chemical attacks in Syria were uploaded a day before the actual attack reportedly happens (Video and screen shots at the link).
Consider that part one.
Part two is a flashback to January, and a Yahoo report sourcing ANI, screenshot below, where they uncovered and predicted exactly what we are seeing today:
The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown. As per the scheme 'Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons...
The same rebel forces that Obama is backing against Syrian leadership. The same rebel forces that were filmed beheading Christians and using child soldiers.
They predicted these chemical attacks would spur actions against Assad, and what do we see in the headlines right now?
US readies possible missile strike against Syria- RT
Is it still be considered a conspiracy theory when present day actions and reports have proven it true? Or is it now safe to say that Obama set this up, approved it, so that he could attack Syria?
The video below shows exactly the type of monsters that Barack Obama is backing.
Cross posted at Before It's News