Custom Search

Sunday, November 07, 2010

Buyer's Remorse In Not Choosing Hillary Clinton

Just a pointer here to a Wapo piece by Dana Milbanks on why Hillary Clinton would have been a better choice for Democrats in 2008 and how she would have handled things differently.

Teaser:

Back then, Clinton's populist appeal to low-income white voters, union members and workers of the Rust Belt was not enough to overcome Obama's energized youth vote. But Clinton's working-class whites were the very ones who switched to the Republicans on Tuesday.

Back in '08, Clinton's scars from HillaryCare were seen as a liability, proof that she was a product of the old ways of Washington. But now that Obama has himself succumbed to the partisanship, his talk of a "growth process" in office makes Clinton's experience in the trenches look like more of an asset.

Clinton campaign advisers I spoke with say she almost certainly would have pulled the plug on comprehensive health-care reform rather than allow it to monopolize the agenda for 15 months. She would have settled for a few popular items such as children's coverage and a ban on exclusions for pre-existing conditions. That would have left millions uninsured, but it also would have left Democrats in a stronger political position and given them more strength to focus on job creation and other matters, such as immigration and energy.


Read it all.

I would not have voted for Hillary against McCain, but if given a choice between Hillary and Obama... Hillary wins hands down, she would have made less of a mess of things for America.

Although Hillary has ruled it out, she may just have been Democrat's savior for 2012 and by indicating she will not run, all hope might be lost for Democrats in the 2012 Presidential election.

.