Custom Search

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Barack Obama's Constant Flip Flops Regarding Iran

Not much time right now to write, but long story short, Obama once again changes his position about Iran.

For the whole story, read The Sun and Commentary Magazine.

As usual Obama was against it before he was for it, then against it again before being for it...etc....

Senator McCain, in his speech yesterday to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, criticized Mr. Obama for opposing a nonbinding resolution designating Iran's primary military organization as terrorists. The Obama campaign responded that their problem with that resolution, sponsored by senators Kyl and Lieberman, had not been the designation of the Iranian guard as a terrorist group, but the idea that it committed American troops in Iraq to countering Iranian influence.


That is from The Sun and Commentary Magazine makes this point:

The relevant section of the Kyl-Lieberman “resolution reads:

[I]t should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies; [and] to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy…with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies.

Nowhere in this language do we find that it gives U.S. troops “an additional mission.” The mission being described here is properly understood as part and parcel of the mission the military already has, which is to win in Iraq. If anything, the additional mission being assigned is to the ”diplomatic, economic, and intelligence” branches of the government.

As spin goes, it’s good. As truth and fact go, it’s bad.


The fact is Barack Obama hasn't a clue and is too inexperience to understand the ramifications of what he speaks about, but is so eager to "appease" not only the terrorist state leaders but his far left base that the truth, what is bad and what is good, what is right or what is wrong...means nothing compared to his policy of appeasement.

No wonder the terrorists are stating they want him to win the election.....says a lot doesn't it?

News for Obama and Obama supporters...when the truth is told, it isn't a smear, that is when someone lies and since a Hamas top adviser, Ahmed Yousef, told WABC radio, "We don’t mind–actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance", John McCain's comment is not only the truth, it is spot on.


When a terrorist endorses you...you have a problem, unless you are a member of the far far left.


.