To say this bull is un-Constitutional is a VERY BIG UNDERSTATEMENT! Start here, with what Obama promised. (maybe the only one he kept)
Oh yes! He said it!
Challenges have been ignored however, as the bill will be voted on tomorrow morning. There is some dangerous "language" though.
Oh yes! He said it!
Challenges have been ignored however, as the bill will be voted on tomorrow morning. There is some dangerous "language" though.
"This is not legislation. It's not law. This is a rule change. It's a pretty big deal. We will be passing a new law and at the same time creating a Senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or even repeal the law. "I'm not even sure that it's constitutional, but if it is, it most certainly is a Senate rule. I don't see why the majority party wouldn't put this in every bill. If you like your law, you most certainly would want it to have force for future senates."
Jim DeMints' whole story here: Taken from Weekly Standard
http://www.newmediajournal.us/the_fifth_column/12222009b.htm
Vid:
Maybe, sometime during the night, the "Ghost Of Christmas Future", will visit just one Dem Senator. Otherwise folks, we are pretty much screwed. Seems the language also implies that future congress, cannot even repeal parts of this idiocy of a bill. Fundamentally Change? Not the change anyone had hoped for, or is going to get. Any of that buyers remorse setting in? I doubt it. Most of those that voted Obama, don't even know what is going on. They have left it in the Messiahs hands. And I have personally met some, and asked. They have this far away look, still, and you can tell, that they are clueless. So you drop the conversation.
Hope and Change indeed! It is un-Constitutional! But, isn't that what Socialism is?
Welcome to The United Snakes Of America! My sarcasm has returned. Just in time......
Skeez