Remember last year as evidence of IRS
targeting certain groups for special 'review' came to public attention?
Uproar ensued, and rightfully so. On May 23, 2013, Obama went in front
of the cameras to do damage control - to show he is in charge! - and
declared that the "...IRS has to operate with absolute integrity.
The government has to conduct itself in a way that is true to the
public trust. That's especially true for the IRS"...???? Refresh your memory here if you have forgotten.
Really, really? Apparently Lois Lerner
didn't get that memo. Lerner, then an IRS Director, was allowed to
assert her innocence of any wrong-doing before a Hearing. Claiming the
5th Amendment, she said that she is "proud" of the work she
has done with the IRS: " [...]I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not
violated any IRS rules or regulations...[...]
Elsewhere in that testimony here, she says she is invoking the right of innocent individuals to protect themselves.
Apparently, that right to innocence, due
process under the law, and an American citizen's right to be treated
with 'absolute integrity,' only applies if you work for the IRS, not for
the tax-payers - who pay the IRS employees' salaries and bonuses.
'Bonuses'? Why, certainly. Take a look at this video from December 2013.This is about those who 'can't wait to intimidate you...and who Americans are more afraid of than al-Qaeda.'
As we have seen in the last few months, when the IRS wields their sledge-hammer, they do so with apparent impunity.
The following chain of events is from a friend - and it IS a true cautionary tale. Read on:
A few months ago, the ATM told
"WK" the money they had in their bank account was "not
available." At first, WK thought it was just a slow processing of
funds. A few days later, with money still 'unavailable' from an ATM,
WK called the bank, only to be told that the IRS claimed they were owed
$87,491.00 in taxes, so WK's bank account had been frozen, on IRS instruction. When asked if the IRS had sent notices of their intentions, WK said that if they had, those notices were not received.
I had
not filed for a refund in years. I was scolded for that by agents of
the IRS, and that was their excuse for making up numbers - that they knew were incorrect - and "filing on
my behalf." An agent told me that they levied
the account "to get my attention." [ Emphasis mine] I explained to them then, again, that I did not owe them any
money, and that pushing the issue would result in them owing me money.
They do. $5,432.50, but the onus was on me to prove
my innocence.
Now, I don't know about YOU, but from
where I sit, a question immediately comes to mind: Can the IRS really
do this? Short answer? Yes, they think they can, and of course, in
this case they did. This should be of concern to every tax-paying
American.
In my extensive research on taxation and the Constitution, I found this:
In 1909, Congress took steps to amend the Constitution by proposing the Sixteenth Amendment in the following form:
Sixteenth Amendment:
The Congress shall have power to lay and
collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without
apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census
or enumeration.
This Amendment was certified as ratified in 1913, and Congress passed an income tax act...
This excerpt is from Judicial Tyranny and your Income Tax written
by attorney Jeffrey A. Dickstein. That link is to the pdf document,
which is almost 400 pages long. I am working my way through it, and it
is enlightening, to say the least. You can also buy these insights in ebook form on Amazon where their synopsis of the contents and the author says:
[...]an experienced tax lawyer, reviews the principle
court decisions regarding the federal income tax, and explains how
persons may be be subjected to improper tax claims if they do not know
what is explained in this book. A must read for tax lawyers,
accountants, and anyone who has dealings with the IRS.
'Dealings with the IRS'. You may
think that WK's story shared above is a rare occurrence. You would be
wrong. Over the last few weeks, I have heard of other incidents of
American citizens falling prey to the IRS heavy-booted (and seemingly
sanctioned) tactics. Fact is, that every day of the week, employees of
the IRS have access to every American's private financial information.
Even sadder is that most Americans have no idea just WHO is making
decisions/judgements about their private financial matters. From what I
am hearing, the IRS employees consider it their duty to intimidate and
browbeat American citizens, and the banks have no choice but to be
accomplices - willing or not.
I have long believed that in any
organization, it is the leaders at the top who set the tone of all the
lower echelon employees within that organization. We saw during the
hearings on the IRS the sneering contempt, the belief that no
bureaucrat is to be held accountable for the obvious mistreatment of
targeted groups.. It seems the monolithic monster that is the IRS can
act with impunity. Don't take my word for it. Research the videos of
other employees called before the Hearings: "I don't know" or "I don't have that information"
were the most commonly offered refrains as answers were sought to
explain the inner working, the process, that is used to determine who
gets targeted by the IRS.
Imagine this scenario: a nameless,
anonymous thug accosts you on a the street demanding you hand over your
money and belongings, or else. When that happens, usually there are
consequences. Within the US Justice system of checks and balances,
oftentimes criminal charges are laid. Not so for the IRS. As we saw
just this past week, but little reported in the msm, after an almost
non-existent 'investigation' of the IRS, the FBI Claims “No Evidence” of Wrongdoing in IRS Targeting Scandal
That
should be reassuring to tax-paying Americans, including all those
conservative group representatives who detailed harassment at the hands
of IRS employees. NOT! Move along, nothing to see here. Yet again, as
with so many levels of bureaucracies within this administration, nobody
takes responsibility, nobody knows anything, and the POTUS falls back
on his "wasn't ME, but I'll get to the bottom of this!" nonsense.
The
majority of the signers of the US Constitution were lawyers, and their
names are enshrined publicly forever. But anonymous IRS employees
continue to do a disservice to the Americans who pay their salaries. I
suspect that the original framers of the freedoms America was based on
are rolling in their graves at the tyranny that now runs rampant in
America.
I
tried to find someone within the IRS who could explain to me the
process behind such arbitrary actions as freezing a citizen's bank
account. Simple logic demands that there must be a policy manual,
procedures clearly laid out that employees must follow before some
anonymous person - on the government payroll - seizes a fellow
American's earnings. Surely, in this most transparent government ever,
Americans are entitled to know the guidelines within which IRS employees
operate? Not so fast. I spent many hours both on the internet, and
then on the phone, trying to find the specific section of an IRS
manual that gives carte blanche to government employees to commit such
flagrant robbery. I was unsuccessful in my efforts.
Even
so, from WK's experiences, and others that I have heard, it appears as
if nameless employees (aka government agents/robbers) are allowed to
cavalierly take citizens' money without due process. In all my reading
on the history and genesis of taxation in America, nowhere, could I find
any suggestion that these actions are what the Founding Fathers
intended for this country.
From WK:
I am reminded of the old cliche: You cannot fight the government. They always win, and you will lose.
I do not believe my battle is over. I am
allowed by the government to use the money I have earned., for now. For the next
few years, I will live with the threat that the IRS will decide to take
every single thing I own, and leave me with a debt that I will never be
able to pay.
Should they make that decision, I will use my last dollar
to fight them. They will not get one more penny out of me.
So far, they have admitted that they owe WK more than a few pennies, ($5,432.50) which
they are refusing to pay. In an apparent internal dispute, two
regional IRS offices can't seem to agree on who owes how much to who.
One says WK owes the IRS $53,761.00, while the other office has
agreed with WK that it is the IRS who owes money, not this tax-payer..
This
American has been a tax-paying, law-abiding member of US society for
decades. WK has more than contributed to many years of tax revenues,
including directly via payroll deduction/taxes. No matter. The IRS
beast can arbitrarily rob any citizen as they decide.
If
you don't think this could happen to you, think again. It can. You may
believe that in America you are still innocent of anything until proven
guilty. Today, however, it seems IRS agents/robbers can treat you like a criminal, and the only one facing consequences is you.
As Obama said in the link above: "This is outrageous, and unacceptable..."
Cut the fake outrage, please. Evidence over the last few months shows
that any action is perfectly acceptable when it comes to fleecing the
citizens.
For
those who would insist that this is an isolated situation that could
never happen to them, couldn't possibly affect them, may I remind you
about ObamaCare? As has been reported, apparently the Commissioner in
charge of the tax exempt section within the IRS - you know, the section
that oversaw the targeting of conservative groups? - was transferred to a new position. Sarah
Hall Ingram is now in charge of running the IRS office responsible for
the ObamaCare legislation. What could possibly go wrong? Never mind
all the other almost unbelievable snafus relating to ObamaCare since
before the 'law' was passed by those who hadn't even read it. That
woman's new appointment, which hands her yet another powerful sledge
hammer, should alert EVERY American that for Obama and the IRS it will
be business as usual: No employee is ever answerable/accountable to
their employer -YOU, the American tax-payer! From the municipal-level
official, right on through to the POTUS, these people work for us. Just
as we are expected to follow principles set out in the Constitution, so
should they be also.
The
only weapon every American citizen has against such tyranny is to pay
attention, know your rights as set out in the US Constitution, and fight
for them.
